Think TV

Visit my store and see
some special things!

Cell-phone shields,
magnesium cream, iodine,
healthy LED bulbs,

best bath and body soaps ever!

Subscribing to my

Newsletter tn

Annual donation of $50
Send check or M.O. to:

Sofia Smallstorm
Avatar Update
PO Box 698
Cardiff CA 92007

Read samples here 

Cell phone shields!

Cell phone shields

Large variety of fabrics/ultrasuede.  Lining blocks radiation.

Order here

I o d i n e

Lugol's Plus iodine

Great daily supplement
for body regulation!

Nascent and Lugol's

Buy here or read more


glossy postcards

Chemtrails Fact Sheet small

Big, beautiful, full-color
10 facts, plus websites for info!
Click to order

Environmental Health Trust et al v. FCC is a historic case aimed at getting the FCC to reconsider, revise, and update its 24-year old exposure limits for radiofrequency radiation (RFR) from cellphones, cell towers, Wi-Fi networks, smart meters, and other wireless communication devices and facilities.

EHS says:  We had our day in court. The truth was on our side and the federal judges asked excellent questions indicating that they read the scientific and policy evidence that EHT has submitted to the FCC over the last decade, much of which is now being used as key evidence in this historic case. "I’m just going to be very upfront with why I am inclined to rule against you," stated Honorable Judge Robert L. Wilkins (a chemical engineer by training) in his questions to FCC counsel Ashley S. Boizelle as he questioned the process by which the FCC and FDA had determined safety.