Arthur Firstenburg gives a history of how wireless technology got a pass in spite of the EPA plans against it.Excerpt:The Electromagnetic Energy Association, an industry lobbying group, succeeded in preventing the EPA’s exposure guidelines from being published. On September 13, 1995, the Senate Committee on Appropriations stripped the $350,000 that had been budgeted for EPA’s work on its exposure guidelines and wrote in its report, “The Committee believes EPA should not engage in EMF activities.”
The Personal Communications Industry Association (CTIA), another industry group, also lobbied Congress, which was drafting a bill called the Telecommunications Act, and a provision was added to the Act prohibiting states and local governments from regulating “personal wireless service facilities” on the basis of their “environmental effects.”That provision shielded the telecommunications industry from any and all liability for injury from both cell towers and cell phones and permitted that industry to sell the most dangerous technology ever invented to the American public. People were no longer allowed to tell their elected officials about their injuries at public hearings. Scientists were no longer allowed to testify in court about the dangers of this technology.Every means for the public to find out that wireless technology was killing them was suddenly prohibited.
As Alison explains (see her website here), blockchain isn't a just cool way of owning your own data (the concept of decentralization) or making money on cryptocurrencies.It will be the ONLY way to live someday soon -- a transaction center for everything, and every move you make. This is the joining of human life to the Metaverse, and our digital twins being built.
Military Lawsuit Against Biden for Mandating Vaccines
A class-action lawsuit filed in Florida in U.S. District Court againstJOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States,LLOYD AUSTIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Defense, and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security by unnamed plaintiffs on the basis of religious stance and beliefs.
Quote:Having recently learned of the use of human abortion derived fetal cell lines in the development, production, or selection and testing of COVID vaccines, AIR FORCE MAJOR’s religious convictions conflict with DoD orders that he partake of them. AIR FORCE MAJOR follows God’s written direction from Scripture, and knows that he must abstain from the use of vaccines derived from aborted fetal cell lines. Per Proverbs 6:16-17, he has a strong conviction that God will judge “hands that shed innocent blood” and he cannot align himself with such deeds.
Read the Complaint here and more about the lawsuit here.
A detailed and alarming discussion between Robert Kennedy, Jr. and Dr. Theresa Deisher, lead scientist at Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute,about the use of fetal tissue in vaccines.
Consider presenting the following (supposedly provided by a lawyer).This is the principle of conditional acceptance (practiced in the field of contracts and commerce).Responses must be given by an authorized representativeof the company/school, etc.
I write with regard to the matter of potential Covid-19 vaccine and my desire to be fully informed and appraised of ALL facts before going ahead. I’d be most grateful if you could please provide the following information, in accordance with statutory legal requirements.
1. Can you please advise the approved legal status of any vaccine and if it is experimental? 2. Can you please provide details and assurances that the vaccine has been fully, independently and rigorously tested against control groups and the subsequent outcomes of those tests? 3. Can you please advise the entire list of contents of the vaccine I am to receive and if any are toxic to the body? 4. Can you please fully advise of all the adverse reactions associated with this vaccine since it’s introduction? 5. Can you please confirm that the vaccine you are advocating is NOT experimental mRNA gene altering therapy? 6. Can you please confirm that I will not be under any duress from yourselves as my employers, in compliance with the Nuremberg Code? 7. Can you please advise me of the likely risk of fatality, should I be unfortunate to contract Covid 19 and the likelihood of recovery? 8. Can you please advise me if I were to experience any adverse reactions is the manufacturer of the vaccine liable? If the manufacturer isn’t liable will the company I’m currently employed with with be responsible & liable as it is their request that I have the vaccine in order to carry on my employment?
Once I have received the above information in full and I am satisfied that there is NO threat to my health, I will be happy to accept your offer to receive the treatment, but with certain conditions – namely that:
1. You confirm in writing that I will suffer no harm. 2. Following acceptance of this, the offer must be signed by a fully qualified doctor who will take full legal and financial responsibility for any injuries occurring to myself, and/or from any interactions by authorized personnel regarding these procedures. 3. In the event that I should have to decline the offer of vaccination, please confirm that it will not compromise my position and that I will not suffer prejudice and discrimination as a result?
I would also advise that my inalienable rights are reserved.
